Physical signals
- Persistent extreme fatigue despite rest, sleep disturbances
- Muscle tension, shiver
- Recurring headaches
- Loss of appetite, nausea, digestive problems
- Hypersensitivity to external stimuli (noise, light, etc.)
This section brings together the practical tools developed to support researchers in all phases of their fieldwork: before departure, during immersion, and upon return.
Name: Date:
Objective: this tool is completed by the researcher alone, prior to departure. It aims to explicit her positionality, her perceived vulnerabilities and anticipated risks, in preparation for an informed discussion with her supervisor (Tool 2).
Gender and potential sexualisation — In this context, how might my gender be interpreted?
Age, academic status — Does my status and my age (actual and perceived) increase the likelihood of being patronised or giving facilitated but biased access to the field?
Nationality, ethnicity — Will I be perceived as a privileged foreigner, potential spy, sexualised woman, credible professional? Will my ethnicity influence my fieldwork?
Language — How might my language level influence my relationship with the field (accent, mistakes, misunderstandings)?
Perceived social class — Do my clothing, phone or social codes create a discrepancy?
Family background — Will I be asked about my “husband”, my parents, my children (or absence thereof), my religion, my social group (e.g. caste)?
Personal constraints — Menstruation, physical and mental health, mental load, disability: what concrete implications?
Physical, environmental (e.g. Extreme temperatures, natural disasters, illness, dangerous modes of transport, conflict zones, pollution, hostile flora and fauna, availability of clean water, power or water cuts)
Political, security-related (e.g. Surveillance, interrogation, permits, morals police)
Interactional (e.g. Unwanted advances, paternalism, alcohol, shifts, assaults, harassment, discrimination, GBSV)
Physical integrity (e.g. Physical violence, bodily constraints, risks associated with searches, pat-downs, intrusive checks, forced exposure to physically demanding situations)
Interview locations (e.g. Closed spaces: bars, private homes, etc. Controlled locations: sensitive areas, high-risk settings, presence of weapons, heavily male-dominated environments)
Social, cultural (e.g. Patriarchal norms, ethnicisation, local hierarchies)
Emotional, psychological (e.g. Overload, stupefaction, secondary shock, extreme exhaustion)
Institutional (e.g. Lack of support, absence of administrative assistance (insurance), vague mission order)
Digital, data (e.g. Intrusive online messaging, menstrual tracking applications, USB drives, data leaks)
Personal, family life (e.g. Family pressure, worry, isolation)
Situations or contexts that seem acceptable to me at this stage:
Situations that feel uncomfortable but are manageable:
Situations that I perceive as non-negotiable for me:
Situations in which I would rather forgo certain data than abandon the fieldwork:
Early warning signs that I fear I might underestimate:
Points on which I would explicitly like my supervisor’s opinion:
What I dare not say — are there any worries, intuitions or past experiences that I have been unable to articulate elsewhere but which feel important to flag?
Objective: to frame together the acceptable risks, institutional support and shared responsibilities.
NB: the elements arising from this joint assessment may under no circumstances be used in an academic, disciplinary or administrative evaluation of the researcher.
Researcher: Supervisor: Date:
What exactly are we seeking to produce?
Which data are essential, secondary, substitutable?
Essential:
Secondary:
Substitutable:
From what level of results do we consider the fieldwork sufficient?
What are the alternatives if a site closes?
What to do if an interlocutor or institution becomes unavailable?
Who can support me? Institutions and supporting actors:
Who could cause me difficulties? Institutions and actors that may pose problems:
This analysis aims to make explicit the asymmetries in resources, power and responsibility between the researcher and her supervisor.
Examples: strengths may include language, networks and experience for the researcher, and institutional contacts and supervision for the supervisor. Weaknesses may include age, isolation and health for the researcher, and absence of protocol or limited knowledge of the fieldwork context for the supervisor. Opportunities may include access to new actors for the researcher, and international cooperation or local partnerships for the supervisor. Threats may include violence, surveillance and harassment for the researcher, and institutional liability engaged for the supervisor.
Strengths:
Researcher:
Supervisor:
Weaknesses:
Researcher:
Supervisor:
Opportunities:
Researcher:
Supervisor:
Threats:
Researcher:
Supervisor:
This matrix formalises the thresholds discussed jointly. The “unacceptable” threshold entails immediate suspension of fieldwork, regardless of how far the research has progressed or the funding committed.
Political risks
Acceptable:
Tolerable:
Unacceptable (compulsory stop):
Interactional risks
Acceptable:
Tolerable:
Unacceptable (compulsory stop):
Physical risks
Acceptable:
Tolerable:
Unacceptable (compulsory stop):
Logistical risks
Acceptable:
Tolerable:
Unacceptable (compulsory stop):
Emotional risks
Acceptable:
Tolerable:
Unacceptable (compulsory stop):
Digital risks
Acceptable:
Tolerable:
Unacceptable (compulsory stop):
In the event of a persistent disagreement between the researcher and her supervisor about the assessment of a risk or a threshold, the precautionary principle prevails. Fieldwork is suspended until arbitration by the competent institution.
Regular check-ins
Agreed frequency:
Format (in-person / online):
Insurance and mission
Person responsible:
Checks carried out:
Emergency contacts
Agreed upon and up-to-date list:
Psychological support
Resources identified:
Means of access:
NB: the elements arising from this joint assessment may under no circumstances be used in an academic, disciplinary or administrative evaluation of the researcher.
Full name of the researcher:
Nationality/ies, travel documents used:
Field, country, location:
Dates of stay (transport, entry and exit from the territory):
Name and contact details of primary supervisor:
Name and contact details of laboratory director:
Institutional safety contact(s):
Local emergency contacts (police, ambulance, embassy):
Trusted person (outside institution):
Physical, environmental:
Political, security-related:
Interactional (harassment, pressure, intimidation):
Interview locations, spatial vulnerability:
Social, cultural, positionality-related:
Psychological, emotional:
Institutional:
Digital, data, technologies:
Personal and family life:
Leave the location, reach safety (how?):
Safe locations identified nearby:
Person to contact immediately (local):
Notify supervisor, director and safety contacts:
Immediate suspension of data collection:
Data backup, isolation and temporary destruction procedure for sensitive data:
Identified means of emergency transport:
Planned backup (where? how?):
Planned encryption:
Digital media used (phone, dictaphone, computer):
Plan in case of seizure, loss or compromise:
Internal incident report planned? (yes/no):
Tool 2 is intended primarily to be completed before fieldwork. However, it also forms part of the RETEX exercise — a form of fieldwork debrief. The various sections of the tool should therefore be revisited with the research supervisor to identify the mechanisms triggered in the field and to assess their relevance or obsolescence following return.
This debrief is archived at a minimum by the thesis supervisor and, where possible, at institutional level. This RETEX exercise is intended to support collective learning and the improvement of practices; it constitutes in no way a tool for individual assessment.
Remember to distribute it across different compartments
Find out about the payment methods available in the country and any restrictions (sanctions, international options, etc.)
Verify that medications are permitted in the destination country and have prescriptions translated if necessary.
Empty your pockets.
Check customs import/export regulations in the destination and transit countries.
“Where is your husband?”
“Where are your children?”
“Why are you alone?”
(supported by photos where relevant)
Before departure, check what is publicly accessible or easily searchable.
Check that photos, messages and content are in keeping with local legislation and social norms of the destination country. For instance: delete or hide intimate or revealing images (including swimwear photos) that could be classified as pornographic in certain legal or cultural contexts.
Date: Fieldwork day no.:
NB: this checklist does not replace a clinical assessment. It is designed as a self-monitoring tool. The signals described may vary in intensity and appear at different moments: sometimes barely perceptible at the time, particularly in situations of intense stress, they may manifest during fieldwork, in the weeks that follow, or several months after return. If in doubt, or if symptoms persist, contact a healthcare professional.
If several symptoms appear simultaneously for more than 72 hours, if an incident continues to invade your thoughts daily, if you feel unable to decide alone on the next steps in the field: contact your reference person, a healthcare professional, speak to a trusted colleague, briefly note what happened, withdraw temporarily if needed: listen to yourself.
Further reading:
This tool can be printed and slipped into a field notebook. It is intended to support careful self-awareness, without any guilt.
Reference person: Phone: